Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae ; (24): 174-180, 2021.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-906378

RESUMO

Objective:To explore the correlation of the botanical characteristics, biological characteristics, habitat, and medicinal property and efficacy of parasitic Chinese medicines, underpin quality evaluation based on property differentiation, and provide references for the development and utilization of parasitic medicinal plant resources. Method:The origin, property and meridian tropism, parasitic type, and the efficacy of the common of parasitic Chinese medicines were summarized. The frequencies of parasitic Chinese medicines in Qingfei Paidu decoction,<italic> Medicine Food Homology</italic>, <italic>Catalogue of Ancient Classical Formulas (the first batch)</italic>, and the 2020 edition of <italic>Chinese Pharmacopoeia</italic> were statistically analyzed. Excel 2013 and SPSS Statistics 23.0 were employed for statistical research. Result:The ranking results of parasitic Chinese medicines are listed below: root parasitism>stem parasitism>root hemiparasitism>symbiosis=saprophytism according to the parasitic type, plain>warm>cool>cold, no heat involved according to nature, sweet>bitter>pungent>sour=salt, with one sweet-pungent, one sweet-bitter, one sweet-salt, and one bitter-salt Chinese medicine according to flavor, kidney>liver>large intestine>spleen>lung>heart=bladder, no small intestine meridian involved according to meridian tropism. Conclusion:Parasitic Chinese medicines were mostly root-parasitic, plain in nature, sweet in flavor, and entered kidney meridian, with main effects of dispelling wind-dampness, nourishing liver and kidney, clearing heat, and removing toxin. The morphology, habit, and habitat of parasitic Chinese medicine were correlated with the property and efficacy. This study is expected to provide comprehensive references and a theoretical basis for in-depth research, clinical application, and resource development.

2.
Journal of Experimental Hematology ; (6): 1079-1085, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-689525

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the prognostic value of morphology and Hans classification in diffuse large B cell lymphoma(DLBCL).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical data of 249 patients diagnosed with DLBCL in our hospital and Hangzhou Xixi hospital during Jan 2006 to Dec 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were classified into 3 groups: immunoblastic variant(IB) group, centroblastic variant(CB) group and others group according to the cell morphology. And DLBCL was also divided into GCB(germinal center B-cell-like)or non-GCB(non-germinal center B-cell-like) group by analyzing the expression of CD10, BCL6 and MUM1 (GCB: CD10 ,BCL6,MUM1/CD10,BCL6,MUM1;non-GCB:CD10,BCL6,MUM1/CD10,BCL6,MUM1).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The univariate analysis displayed that the age,LDH level,IPI,IB,non-GCB,B-symptoms and rituximab all could influence the OS and EFS, the CR rate of CB subtype patients was significantly higher than that of the patients with IB subtype (68.3% vs 38.9%)(P=0.02). IB subtype was the in dependent prognostic factor for both EFS and OS in the whole study. In multivariate analysis, IPI and IB were the independent prognostic factors for OS and EFS. IB subtype was also an independent prognostic factor in EFS and OS with or without rituximab. The expression of BCL2 and BCL6 was related with prognosis in R-CHOP, but not in CHOP treated patients. Other markers (CD5, CD10, IRF4/MUM1, HLA-DR and Ki-67 proliferation index) were not of the significant prognostic value for DLBCL. When accepted rituximab, the GCB and non-GCB were not different significantly for prognosis. However, the non-GCB group showed a poor prognosis without using rituximab (EFS P=0.020;OS P=0.020). Multivariate Cox models showed that OS and EFS were not significantly different between GCB and non-GCB group, however, the IB subtype had a very significantly poor prognosis in OS and EFS (P=0.001, P=0.002). When the analysis was restricted to DLBCL with CB morphology only, no prognostic value was observed in Hans classification.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The subtype of immunoblast is a major risk factor in patients treated with CHOP or R-CHOP. There is a significant association between the Hans classification and the morphologic subclassification. Results of this study have supplemented the data for the prognostic factor of DLBCL and demonstrated that the cytomorphologic diagnosis can be reproducible.</p>


Assuntos
Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Ciclofosfamida , Doxorrubicina , Imuno-Histoquímica , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rituximab
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA